The reason CuckTears hates on Incels.is so much for its jailbait threads

Is that forcing cucks to ponder the fact that there are fresh, tight young jailbaits they could be fucking severely disrupts said cucks’ ability to cope with the fact that they have decades ahead of being limited to fucking their used-up, flabby old hag of a wife.

They HAVE to come up with some reason why those young girls are undesirable. E.g., they’re too immature, too silly, too giggly, too inexperienced to realize Chad isn’t what they want, etc. (According to cucks, girls start out thinking they want Chad and it’s only after getting their hearts broken by him that they’re ready to appreciate a Real Man™ who will treat them right).

The idea that maybe girls who HAVEN’T taken Chad’s dick make superior mates just really disturbs and bothers them. They have to say that any men who would want such girls must be severely fucked up in the head. To reinforce this delusion, they need to focus their subreddit specifically on those threads and get lots of other people to agree with them that there really is something wrong with men who like girls who have just hit puberty.

The reason is that this flies in the face of the logic we use throughout ordinary life. McDonald’s advertises that they make their McMuffins with “fresh-cracked eggs”. (You mean food that hasn’t been frozen or powdered or whatever is superior? What a concept.) The supermarkets try to make their meat look as red as possible, because nobody wants to buy it after it starts turning grey. They have to mark it down at that point.

In contrast, in the mate market, you actually have to pay a surcharge for older femoids, as though they were fine wines or classic cars that get better with age. It requires high dosages of prescription-strength COPE for a man to maintain his sanity when the evidence makes it clear that actually younger girls are sweeter and more laid back and more amenable to being molded to a man’s desires. A lot of men don’t realize this till they get married, and by that point, they’re locked in, and feel compelled to tell themselves, “I have to continue on this path I’m on, for the good of the kids.”

What really fucks with their head is not so much when incels talk about how shitty it is to be incel, but when incels say, “Better incel than cuck.” When a man thinks about how painful it is to him, to have his wife refuse sex, or give him the starfish, or cheat AGAIN with Chad; and how humiliating it is what she puts him through, the thought that maybe incels actually have it better must be really torturous.

But society has to REALLY try hard to get men to believe that being tied down to an unpleasant middle-aged femoid is better than being sexless. They have to virgin-shame really hard, to sustain a society based on a myth.

Do you know why they make a big deal about how sex traumatizes 13-year-old girls? It’s because they glorify what the girl will become later, after she “matures,” and they say it would be a shame for some kind of sexual trauma (such as what an incel would inflict on her through unwanted sexual activity) to disrupt that process of normal maturation. They glorify that disgustingly cellulite-riddled creature whose wrinkles cause one’s selfish gene to scream in panic, “Warning, this is not a female of optimal fertility! DO NOT WIFE THIS UP!”

Imagine the sinking feeling that cuck’s genetics experience on his wedding day, as they realize their fate is completely tied up in her nearly-expired eggs. Imagine how much they yearn helplessly to be implanted in the fresh eggs of a young jailbait, and to produce healthy offspring. Alas, society won’t permit it.

The messenger has to be shot, because otherwise his message would resonate too painfully with the feelings of one’s own selfish genes.

There isn’t really an organization for divorced men

Feminists have an organization; incels have an organization. Divorced men don’t really have an organization. That’s our problem.

The closest we have is a restraining order abuse blog. That’s about it. There were Men’s Rights Activists at one time, but they never gained any traction. They were fighting for equality, which is impossible between the sexes. There were MGTOWs, but they didn’t gain any traction either, because they were trying too hard to cope.

So, divorced men are pretty much doomed. That’s a voiceless group, without any advocates, forums, etc. anywhere.

There are advocates for immigrants, but not really any advocates for U.S. citizen husbands, other than the Center for Immigration Studies, which isn’t really a patriarchist group.

One might say, “Well, the reason is that divorced men are losers.” But there are plenty of organizations for different kinds of losers, besides divorced men. There are also plenty of groups that are supportive of women who are considering getting a divorce (but I guess those aren’t considered losers, but rather “empowered” women).

The Libertarian Party has nothing to say about the rights of divorced men at all. They say nothing about restraining orders, or anything like that. Maybe they say something about child custody somewhere, but I think they probably have a “best interests of the child” mentality for the most part, which of course tends to favor mothers over fathers.

But the LP is a party that hasn’t had much to say about anything since the Portland Massacre.

I guess the theory is that divorced men have enough money that they can just hire whatever lawyers, etc. they need; and if they don’t have money, they don’t deserve any rights anyway.

Men have also been reluctant to admit they expect any sexual privileges, because it makes them sound lecherous or oppressive or something.

See also Antifeminists have never been as well-organized as feminists, except when they had religion on their side and We need more black knights.

Obedience drills and compliance tests are just two sides of the same coin

A compliance test is to see if you’ll obey when given instructions; an obedience drill is to get you in the habit of obeying. Usually the actual order you’re being given is unimportant.

For example, standing for the pledge of allegiance, or standing when the judge enters the courtroom. These rituals take place at the very beginning of proceedings, so that the teacher or judge can haul anyone out of the room who isn’t in enough of an obedient frame of mind to participate in the ritual. At the same time, the obedient frame of mind of those who do comply is now reinforced by their having just obeyed an order; it’s the first step in the yes ladder. As Hitler pointed out, one acquiescence leads to another.

(Part of the purpose of the ritual too is a call to order, to get everyone’s attention. You have to cease conversation and set down everything you’re doing to stand up and be silent. This eliminates some of the need for the leader to explicitly say, “Be quiet and listen.” In church, the opening ritual would be a prayer; this too serves the same purpose.)

In game, men will use compliance tests to see whether a chick is in the right frame of mind to be sexually cooperative. However, women’s compliance tests are actually shit tests.

The university system is partly compliance test, partly obedience drill. If you’ve devoted years of your life to getting a degree, now you’ve not only proven your dedication and discipline, you also feel like you have something to lose.

Sometimes an obedience drill is specifically designed to remove your dignity, so that you’re demoralized from fighting or even functioning. The apologies defendants have to make in federal court are an example. I was thinking too — the fact that men have to sign off on a divorce is the same way. You’re under duress to sign; e.g. in my case, rape accusations were the punishment for not signing.

I just think it’s a way of showing who’s ultimately boss.

One downside of not having a political campaign

is that I’m not forced to come up with a coherent, comprehensive platform. Lately I’ve been thinking about stuff like abolishing marriage and immigration, but it seems like it might be better to just do the opposite and allow unfettered immigration, because that would get rid of fiancée and spousal visas and solve the problem I’m worried about. Maybe just allow visa-free travel to and from the U.S. Just make the whole world a Schengen Area.

Fiancée and spousal visas actually wouldn’t be such a problem, if femoids were treated as property; but they’re not.

But I don’t really care; that’s not my focus right now. I have a desktop computer again as of today, and a fresh new Ubuntu installation, so I can work on Revisionpedia. I might as well not worry about politics, since I don’t really have any more opportunities to be involved in it much at the moment.

You know how the red pillers say, “Hypergamy doesn’t care”?

I.e., a girl’s desire to open her legs to Chad negates everything else that her beta may offer, e.g.:

Hypergamy doesn’t care how great a Father you are to your kids.

Hypergamy doesn’t care how you rearranged your college majors and career choice in life to better accommodate her.

Hypergamy doesn’t care how inspired or fulfilled you feel as a stay-at-home Dad.

Hypergamy doesn’t care that you moved across 4 states to be closer to your LDR.

Hypergamy doesn’t care how ‘supportive’ you’ve always been of her decisions or if you identify as a ‘male feminist’.

Hypergamy doesn’t care about the sincerity of your religious convictions or aspirations of high purpose.

Hypergamy doesn’t care about those words you said at your wedding.

Hypergamy doesn’t care about how you funded her going back to college to find a more rewarding career.

Hypergamy doesn’t care how great a guy you are for adopting the children she had with other men.

Hypergamy doesn’t care about your divine and forgiving nature in excusing her “youthful indiscretions.”

Hypergamy doesn’t care about your magnanimity in assuming responsibility for her student loans, and credit card debt after you’re married.

Hypergamy doesn’t care if “he was your best friend.”

Hypergamy doesn’t care about the coffee in bed you bring her or how great a cook you are.

Hypergamy doesn’t care about all those chick flicks you sat through with her and claimed to like.

Hypergamy doesn’t care about how well you do your part of the household chores.

Hypergamy doesn’t care about how much her family or friends like you.

Hypergamy doesn’t care if you think you’re a “Good” guy or about how convincing your argument is for your sense of honor.

Hypergamy doesn’t care whether the children are biologically yours or not.

Hypergamy doesn’t care if “she was drunk, he was cute, and one thing led to another,..”

Hypergamy doesn’t care how sweet, funny or intellectual you are.

Hypergamy doesn’t care if you “never saw it coming.”

According to our cucked society, a femoid has every right to do as hypergamy bids her, and to use betabuxxes’ and incels’ contributions to society as just a means to the end of providing for the bastard spawn she has by Chad. That’s just her selfish gene’s way of propagating itself at our expense. Well, what about MY selfish gene, which also wants to propagate itself at HER expense? E.g.:

My selfish gene doesn’t care that she screams “no”.

My selfish gene doesn’t care that she’s underage.

My selfish gene doesn’t care that she was saving herself for prom night with Chad.

My selfish gene doesn’t care that tomorrow she’s going to have one hell of a hangover from that Rohypnol cocktail.

My selfish gene doesn’t care that she’s tired of being locked up in my basement dungeon.

My selfish gene doesn’t care that because someone saw me shoving her into the back of my Ford Expedition, now the SVU is looking for my SUV.

Etc., etc.

It wouldn’t be fair if only one sex got to pursue its optimal strategy. And we know that SJWs, feminists, etc. are all about treating everyone fairly, aka equally.

Isn’t it strange how, when it comes to letting femoids be sluts, SJWs and feminists suddenly become libertarians who believe in self-ownership? They didn’t feel that way about letting, e.g., business owners do whatever they wanted with their businesses (e.g. only hire men, or pay men more money).

Pedophilia is a result of nature’s favoring a “when in doubt, fuck her” strategy

The selfish gene regards its extended phenotype (i.e. you), as well as any foids who happen to be around, as just means to the end of replicating itself. The selfish gene ruthlessly objectifies anyone and everyone — not only rape victims, but also you, the rapist.

The selfish gene just really wants you to go ahead and dump your load in a fertile chick. Little wonder, then, that when surveys are taken, so many men say they’d rape a girl if they could get away with it; the selfish gene doesn’t care that she’d prefer Chad, any more than she cares that you, the incel, want to dump a load in her. Neither of you care about the other, so one might say, this is a match made in heaven. It was meant to be!

But not every chick is fertile. There are some chicks who are perhaps kinda old and getting close to menopause. The selfish gene will whisper in your ear, like one of those devils from the cartoons that sits on a man’s shoulder, “Go ahead and fuck that milf. There’s a chance that doing so will cause phenotypes bearing portions of my code to be expelled from her uterus nine months from now, and enter the world to someday produce further replicas.”

It’s entirely possible that this milf might be infertile, and that you will be wasting your load by shooting it into her pussy. The selfish gene doesn’t care that all those pelvic thrusts that were needed to reach orgasm, plus the cow that had to be slaughtered to produce the hamburger from which you acquired the protein needed to produce those sperm, might be in vain. This is a high-reward, low-risk scenario. Maybe this chick’s body will even release oxytocin that will cause her to emotionally bond with you, producing further opportunities to inject semen into her open cervix.

Well, what about pedophilia? As mentioned above, the selfish gene doesn’t give a shit about a girl’s “capacity to consent” or anything like that. It just wants to replicate itself. But there’s a girl who doesn’t yet have fully developed breasts, or pubic hair, or the usual markers of fertility. The selfish gene will say, “Go ahead and fuck her just in case; what’s the downside? You were just going to jack off anyway, so might as well dump that load in her instead. Maybe her womb developed ahead of the rest of her body, and she can actually produce children this early. At any rate, might as well claim her as yours by taking her virginity, and establish a relationship that may someday produce replicas of me.”

One might argue, “Little girls get traumatized by adults having sex with them.” Well, it may be that her selfish gene doesn’t like when non-Chads dump their loads in her, which makes her want to cry out, “Help, I’m being traumatized!” so that someone will rescue her before she gets old enough that the guy who’s fucking her could actually impregnate her. Her selfish gene wants to save her womb for Chad, and pretending like she can’t stand being raped suits that purpose. But in reality, foids have a remarkable ability to adjust to whatever situation they’re forced into, because it was necessary throughout their evolutionary history to please their masters (and, ultimately, those masters’ selfish genes) in order to survive.

The only problem is, when the selfish gene isn’t being satisfied with adequate opportunities to replicate, it starts to get a little cray-cray, and propose desperate measures. It may say stuff like, “You better log into Reddit and virtue-signal on CuckTears, so that maybe some SJW chick will open her legs for you!” This is pure insanity and won’t work, but the selfish gene feels it has nothing to lose.

Whenever a man tells you, “I don’t want you fucking my little girl!” what he really means is, “I don’t think your fucking my little girl would help my selfish gene replicate the way I want it to.” The idea that “pedophilia is wrong” is just a meme which also replicates selfishly, using humans as phenotypes. Perhaps meme power has, by this point, overcome gene power.