I was reading this Fauquier Times article:
In an Aug. 13 blog post that has since been made private, Larson endorsed Comstock’s Democratic challenger, state Sen. Jennifer Wexton, in the November election. Wexton spokesman Ray Reiling, however, said the senator would not accept Larson’s endorsement and called his views “abhorrent.”
“We do not under any circumstances accept Mr. Larson’s endorsement. His views are abhorrent and we strongly condemn them,” Reiling said in an emailed statement.
(“Abhorrent” is a word that’s always used in a sanctimonious context, I’ve noticed.)
Anyway, she can’t really decline an endorsement. That’s like declining to accept an employee’s resignation. These are unilateral acts, not requiring the permission of the other party.
What I’ve suggested is that libertarian- and conservative-leaning voters pump and dump Jennifer Wexton. Use her in the 2018 general election to get rid of Barbara Comstock, and then discard her in the 2020 general election by voting in Shak Hill or some other Republican — hopefully somebody who’s better than Comstock (making sure of that is why it’s important to vote in the primaries). Or if you’re libertarian, and there’s a libertarian candidate on the ballot in 2020, then of course vote for him.
Anyway, Wexton can’t stop people from voting for her based on my advice. As long as she’s on the ballot (and even if she withdrew, since the voters are entitled to write her in; what is she gonna do, make a Sherman pledge?), people can vote for her as a way of purging out Comstock from the Republican Party, with the intent of voting in another Republican in 2020. Of course, she can try to hang on in 2020, rather than getting voted out.
But at least at first, Wexton will be in a weaker position than Comstock is, when it comes to pushing feminist policies, because she’ll be a freshman Congresswoman, rather than someone who’s already been there for two terms. Voting against incumbents is also a great way to register your displeasure with the direction in which the government is going. And if you’re a Trump fan, it’s potentially helpful to Donald Trump to have a Democratic majority for the next couple years, since he can use Pelosi as a foil in the 2020 presidential election.
Not that any of this really matters all that much, since we’re not going to be able to stop the acceleration into the feminist singularity. When conservatives get elected people think, “Hooray, we’re gonna make the country great again.” Margaret Thatcher turned back years of socialist “progress” in the U.K., for example. It didn’t change the fact that the U.K. is nothing compared to what it once was. Their civilization is still on the decline; their fertility rate is 1.81, for example. Brexit isn’t going to change the fact that relations between the sexes are as dysfunctional there as anywhere.
Same deal with Germany. Hitler was a heroic guy, who made some progress in bringing Germany’s fertility rate back up. But he wasn’t able to stay in power, and now Germany’s fertility rate is 1.50.
Slight correction to this part of the article, by the way:
Larson said he suspects the members of the “Anonymous” hacking group were responsible for the burglary because they left behind a note and a U-lock bicycle lock, which he said is signature symbol of the group.
Maybe I misremember, but I thought what I said on the phone to the reporter was, the note said Anonymous took credit for the burglary, but I suspect Antifa because they’ve used bike locks on people before.
Most famously, there was an incident in Berkeley where Antifa member Eric Clanton hit a 20-year-old college student, Sean Stiles, over the head with a U-lock.
Antifa had put out a call to take action against me. It could be that whoever did it belonged to both organizations. Those are both leftist groups.