From now on, anywhere in the incelosphere where I say “Vote Libertarian” it means “Go ER”

The Daily Stormer got into a bind where they had to refrain from advocating violence so that they wouldn’t get subpoenaed; yet if they were to say, “Just sit on your hands because there’s nothing we can do” that would have made it seem like they were denigrating the significance of their own cause.

The reality is that violence, suicide, and other illegal acts could be deemed logical and even justified in light of how a large segment of the population has been reduced to a sexually disenfranchised underclass of slaves. But we’re not allowed to say that.

The workaround Andrew Anglin came up with was to tell his followers, “Vote Republican!” We know that literally voting Republican won’t cause any significant change. Most Republican politicians are cucks who consistently vote for the femiservative agenda. We’ve had a Republican President and Congress for two years now, and life has gotten worse for incels during that time. Censorship has continued eroding even our right to free speech, and the Trump administration has hit sites like with subpoenas without sufficient evidence to support a determination of probable cause.

Brett Kavanaugh got put on the Supreme Court, and he promptly chose a bunch of femoids to be his law clerks, because he’s such a good little beta that he gets along with ambitious career femoids well. He definitely has not said anything about how the way he was treated during the confirmation process demonstrates how femoids need to be put in their place. Do you really think this guy is going to overturn Roe v. Wade — or that if he did, that would bring back patriarchy?

Over on the other forum, I got hit with a 10% warning level for saying, “We know what needs to be done; it’s just a matter of getting up and doing it.” We can’t even make oblique references to going ER now, I guess because some filmmaker might put it in a dramatization of the incelosphere. We can expect that the major incel forum(s) will become more and more cucked in an effort to survive, until they either (1) become completely irrelevant or (2) get shut down even after they’ve reached maximum cuckoldry, the way that Return of Kings and r/TheRedPill got shut down, even though they disallowed saying anything all that misogynistic.

Do you really think that in the 21st century, it’s going to be allowed for a high-profile Internet forum to be “noninclusive” by disallowing femoid users, and to be “misogynistic” by saying the behavior femoids are allowed to get away with is the cause of our problems? The other forum (don’t know what to call it, since they’ve been switching domains) doesn’t even allow white knighting or the expression of bluepilled views. Do you think Iceland is going to let that fly?

However, if people on the Internet see us saying, “Vote Libertarian” they can’t really screenshot that and use it against us. We’re just advocating the use of the democratic process to get our ideals implemented; nothing wrong with that. And guess what, the original Libertarian party platform used “sexist” language, in the same way the Declaration of Independence did. It was only over time that they became cucked into being a left-of-center party.

Remember too what that patriarchist shitlord Murray Rothbard wrote, “Having a desire for a ham sandwich, a man decides that this is a want that should be satisfied and proceeds to act upon his judgment of the methods by which a ham sandwich can be assembled. . . . Typically, in order to produce a ham sandwich for Jones in his armchair, it is necessary for his wife to expend energy in unwrapping the bread, slicing the ham, placing the ham between bread slices, and carrying it to Jones.” It was just assumed back then that femoids existed to serve men.

Incels and pedophiles

The two movements are running into the same problem, which is that the system of free love is breaking down. Free love is based on the idea of, “What if the girl consents, tho?” Pedophilic free love is just a subset of that: “What if the LITTLE girl consents, tho?”

#MeToo is invalidating consent across the board, by allowing women to call into question whether they were truly able or willing to consent. And of course, anyone who doubts a rape allegation is a misogynist in the MeToo’ers view.

We have situations where the police are taking seriously allegations that a husband raped his wife, so that men can’t even use the argument, “What if the wife consents, tho” anymore. Already, of course, drunken sex has been categorized as rape, so that we can’t say, “What if the drunk girl consented, tho.”

So now we’re going to try to establish a legal principle based on the idea of, “What if the child consents, tho”? The politics are headed in the opposite direction, of considering everything victimization that used to be categorized as potentially consensual.

The only area in which the feminists have wanted to grant any wiggle room was in letting teen girls have sex with boys their own age. Since provisioning isn’t a factor in that situation, teen girls are mostly choosing sex partners based on looks, game, and other superficial qualities, which means it’s generally going to be Chad rather than the bottom 80% of teen boys who get sex.

But that’s pretty much how feminists want it, because their agenda is to keep girls in school, rather than setting them up with a older guy who’s going to provision for them. The feminists are not going to be cool with letting older men get with 3-year-old girls, because the two might fall in love and he might start provisioning for her, and encourage her to leave school.

The cornerstone of feminism is keeping girls in school so that they don’t end up in a situation where they’re financially dependent on a husband or boyfriend.

Humans view being a “loser” in relative, not absolute, terms

It’s always been a human tendency to compare oneself to others and try to keep up with the Joneses. That’s how we figure out our place in the social hierarchy. There’s safety in being part of the herd; you don’t want to be a straggler that could get picked off by wolves.

Well, what happens when suddenly there are massive numbers of “losers”? I.e., lots of people can’t achieve their goals? Then suddenly there’s not so much pressure to achieve, to keep up with the Joneses. The Joneses are losing right along with you.

If you live in some third-world country where practically everyone is living in a run-down shack, do you really care all that much that you also live in a run-down shack? There’s no embarrassment associated with it. It’s just normal. No wonder, then, that third-worlders often seem so happy and carefree. They don’t have a lot of worries, because it would be hard for them to fall any lower than they already are. The first-worlder, on the other hand, is worried, “If I lose my job, the bank might foreclose on my McMansion, and I might end up living in a run-down shack!”

Well, it’s the same way with incels. If only a small percentage of the population is incel, then it seems shameful. But what happens when a large percentage is incel? Then it starts to seem normal. You look around and there are ordinary guys who are incel. This implies that you don’t need to have anything wrong with you, to be incel, just like in a third-world country, you don’t need to have anything wrong with you, to live in a run-down shack.

That’s what makes incel sites so comfy. There’s this sense of, “You are not alone.” In fact, your online neighbors are in the same boat. And there are millions of them.

When society is in decline, even those who DO have something wrong with them now are on the same level as ordinary people. So for example, in a third-world country, if you have 80 IQ, you might still live in the same kind of run-down shack as the guy with 120 IQ. At that point, IQ doesn’t even matter that much.

And we see in American society too, the normie-tier guy is not doing too much better than the ugly man, in terms of what he’s able to pull. Neither of them is going to get a virginal bride. The normie might get cheated on and frivorce-raped, and lose his kid to his wife. So both the cuck and the incel end up alone, and without any kids to raise.

The incel gets jealous at seeing obnoxious brutes with beautiful blondes on their arms. But the normie also has reason to be jealous about the fact that his wife got fucked by Chad all through her youthful prime, and still fantasizes about Chad and probably cheats with Chad, and won’t give her husband the kind of great sex she gave Chad.

One of the disadvantages of this type of scenario, from the standpoint of society, is that it becomes no longer possible to control and manipulate men by appealing to their desire to keep up with the Joneses. When massive numbers of men have been disenfranchised, then being disenfranchised starts to feel comfy.

It can be demoralizing sometimes to be dehumanized by a bureaucracy that treats everyone the same. Even the rich guy who drives a luxury car has to sit around at the DMV and wait for his number to be called, just like the poor guy who drives a beat-up clunker. From the standpoint of the poor guy, though, being treated equally to the rich guy is a step up in the world.

What society has done, then, in fucking over normies and taking away their sexual prerogatives, is effectively elevate those men who used to be shamed for being incels, by subjecting the masses of men to treatment that is almost as bad as what incels endured. If the normie has to settle for being a cuck, then suddenly being incel doesn’t seem as horrible in comparison as it used to.

The way feminists respond to this state of affairs is by saying, “See, these misogynists are everywhere! There are millions who demonstrate their misogyny by complaining about being forced into inceldom or cuckoldry. This shows how numerically dominant, and therefore powerful, these misogynists are, and how capable they are, by force of numbers, of oppressing all women.” That doesn’t really prove anything, though; that would be like Bashar al-Assad were to say, “Look how many Sunni Muslims there are in the Syrian population; see how they’re in a position to systematically oppress me?”

Femoids say, “1 in 3 women gets raped; that shows we’re oppressed we are.” Actually, it shows how they’re so powerful that they’re in a position to manipulate the statistics, and keep anyone from questioning those statistics by the threat of being called a misogynist. It’s kind of like how the way you know that Jews are actually the powerful ones is that we have to listen constantly to stories about the Holocaust without questioning them.

How much of anti-pedo sentiment is just a gigacope for the fact that prepubescent girls are off-limits?

The easiest thing to do, when you can’t have something, is to take a sour-grapes attitude toward it. That’s why when men get to be in, say, their 50s, and can no longer pull 20-year-old girls as easily, they start to talk about how 20-year-old girls aren’t that great anyway. They start talking about how they prefer older femoids’ maturity. (Another reason is that they don’t want to seem like perverts for wanting to violate the half-your-age-plus-seven rule.)

Well, it could be the same way with prepubescents. They’re off-limits, so it’s easiest to just say, “I wouldn’t want a girl that young anyway. Real men prefer older women.” I saw this dude over at RVF saying that as you get older, “you start to look at other attributes of the woman… like pleasantness, conversation and positivity (all things lacking in hot young things)”. If that were true, then Hugh Hefner should’ve been using his money and fame to attract femoids his age, rather than young bunnies, because why wouldn’t you want the best you can get, if you’re in such high demand?

As soon as you admit that something you can’t have is desirable, then it starts to torment you, especially if you see other men having it. Why do you suppose child pornography had to be banned? Men couldn’t handle seeing other men doing stuff with prepubescent girls, that they’re not allowed to do. People justify these laws by saying, “The victim gets revictimized every time the video is watched,” but there will come a day when those girls are long dead of old age and buried, and the videos out of copyright (and therefore unable to generate income streams), yet the videos will remain illegal because they will retain their power to arouse male desire.

Remember what drove Elliot Rodger nuts — seeing obnoxious brutes with beautiful blonde girls, and knowing how much he wanted to have that. He wasn’t able to just tell himself, “Blondes aren’t that great anyway; they’re so dumb,” etc.

If men were to acknowledge that getting a blowjob from a prepubescent girl might actually feel good, it would produce discontentment at not getting to have that. Part of what child porn videos reveal, that must be kept hidden from the world, is that some of these little girls have some skills and talent at sucking dick, and really give it their all, even before reaching puberty.

Some cucks hate this type of thread because it interferes with their ability to gigacope with the fact that even if they ascend, they still won’t be allowed to get their dick sucked by a cute little girl. The truth hurts, but you gotta face it with courage. It’s just part of taking the blackpill.

Child porn sites aren’t really all that different from incel sites

When you think about it, they have a lot in common.

Why do so many incels use anime avatars? It’s to substitute for degenerate, unpleasant, uncooperative modern femoids by putting forth an image of an idealized femoid. The waifu is perfect in every way — submissive, loving, innocent, etc.

It’s the same with child porn; the prepubescent girl is idealized as undefiled, sweet, and cute, in contrast to the Chad-obsessed pubescent girl who ruthlessly pursues her alpha fucks/beta bucks imperative.

In reality, even if we could bring anime to life, those girls would just behave like any other femoids, because AWALT. Remember how Jessica Rabbit behaved as a thot, when she was brought into the world of non-cartoon men? It’s the same issue that arises when you bring foreign femoids into the U.S. as mail-order brides; even if they’re from a country like the Philippines where divorce is illegal, that doesn’t preclude them for filing for divorce in American courts once they’re here.

Similarly, although prepubescent femoids are idealized as better than pubescent femoids, they can still be very manipulative. As soon as they can talk, they instinctively start lying to get out of trouble, to obtain what they want, etc. That’s just immutable female nature. As they develop and gain experience, they’ll become more subtle in their manipulativeness.

If there’s a power balance between young foids and older men, it’s mostly because young foids haven’t yet become experts at using deceit to get men to do what they want. People usually say, “Older men will trick little girls into sex.” It’s more like, little girls might not be as adept at exploiting men for their resources yet, without resorting to cuteness as a means of persuasion.

A redpilled man will realize, all older femoids have to offer, that younger femoids lack, is greater ability to get men to do what they want, through deployment of a bag of tricks they’ve perfect over years. But older femoids are still jealous of younger femoids’ cuteness, which has a more reliable effect on men than older femoids attempts to spin their drawbacks as virtues (e.g. by saying “age” is equivalent to “maturity” or that “sluttiness” is equivalent to “experience” (i.e. sexual prowess).)

Like incel sites, child porn sites served as (mostly) all-male hangouts, where men could hang out in a comfy environment and pass the time without the need for femoids. We can’t have that, though, apparently.

Hey incels, why do you want a femoid, anyway?

Yeah, it feels good to put your dick in one, but that’s about it. You can’t relate to them the way you could relate to a fellow man, so they’ll never be a “friend” (it’s often assumed, in phrases like “more than friends,” that friendship is the foundation of a romantic relationship, but it’s typically not; as soon as you’re going to be boyfriend-girlfriend, or husband-wife, the dynamics change).

If you have a sister, you already know that relations even between male-female siblings are not what they would be between brothers. It was Orville and Wilbur Wright, two brothers, who built an airplane; that would never happen between a brother-and-sister team, because they would never have the same interests. She would be wanting to chase after boys rather than sit around working on airframes.

Also, as early as manosphere 2.0, red pillers were talking about how women can’t love men the way men want to be loved. Also, girls want a man they can look up to; which means the love they’ll have for you is like the love of a daughter for a father, not the unconditional love of a mother for her son. You always have the burden of performance.

That makes me wonder, by the way — is there some pair bonding that happens between father and daughter, or is that conditional love too? Well, I know of one family where the father wasn’t that great of a breadwinner, and I think his relationship with his daughters, or at least the eldest daughter anyway, was troubled. That’s usually the kind of situation where a proxy father (like a pastor) has to step in to help.

Anyway — if a femoid likes you, that’s just a sign you have either the alpha fuxx or beta buxx, which is another way of saying, you either are really good looking, or are mediocre-looking but have money. Why do you want someone who’s so shallow and/or mercenary? You might as well hang out with your brothers instead, aside from the fact that you need a femoid to produce kids with and help care for and raise them (since you have to be at work most of the day).

Even then, though, they’re just the most responsible teenager in the house.

Women don’t age well

As time goes on, and bad shit happens in women’s lives, their personalities get worse and worse, as the bitterness accumulates. It might be the same way with men, but at least it’s offset by the fact that men gain wisdom, knowledge, maturity, etc. as they get older (theoretically). Women just degrade in quality as they age; not only do they become less pleasant to be around, but their pussies become looser, their tits start to sag, their bodies generally lose their nice youthful shape, etc.

This wouldn’t be such a big problem, except that older women don’t even want men to have the pleasure of being with a young woman; they apparently expect you to abide by the half-your-age-plus-seven rule, or maybe something even stricter. Meanwhile, there are apparently some men who want to uphold that same rule; I’m not sure why.

These girls’ expectations are just too high. They want a man who’s only slightly older than them, who nonetheless has his shit together, doesn’t mind the fact that she’s been with a bunch of Chads, etc. As girls get older, their expectations only rise. E.g., they start expecting that men will tolerate their being polyamorous, etc.

This could all be curbed through patriarchism, but maybe it’s best to first just let the process play out the way it currently is playing out. Let the leftists double down on feminism; even vote for the leftists sometimes, if they’re not currently the incumbents.

Actually, what might be optimal would be to just vote for the Libertarians, who want to give women equal rights and theoretically want to also cut off all welfare payments to single moms, etc. What we’ll see happen, I think, is that those girls will just return to their fathers or something, or maybe they’ll find some beta cuck. It will be slightly better than letting them live off of the government, though.

Theoretically, the betas should just reject non-virginal girls, and that would solve a lot of our problems; I’m not sure if it’ll play out that way, though. There’s a huge amount of propaganda out there in favor of wifing up non-virgins. Men are always going to want to play Captain Save-a-Ho just because they think they should help a girl who’s been fucked over by Chad, even though they purposefully bypassed the nice guys to get with said Chads. Oh well.

Incels are not a particularly large movement, and I don’t think awareness of alpha-fuxx, beta-buxx strategies is really going to spread very widely outside of a few communities, many of which (e.g. the Rooshosphere) seem to be shrinking right now. Blacks have been aware of the Captain Save-a-Ho phenomenon for awhile now, but that doesn’t really help whites; whites could probably listen to that song and not understand what it’s about.

The media really has to struggle these days to find any newsworthy stories

They just really don’t have enough villains these days to sustain much of a storyline.

Consider incels, for example. There have been two guys (Rodger and Minassian) who were officially considered “incel” killers. Rodger killed six, Minassian killed ten. Not a very high death count, when you consider how many incels are out there who advocate going ER. But the media really tries hard to spin a story about how incels are dangerous misogynists. Even Roosh tried to get in on the action, writing a piece about how to get incels to stop killing people, as though many of them are killing people.

When you consider my candidacy, what was really newsworthy about it? I supposedly admitted to being a pedophile. That’s not even a big deal, though; there are a lot of pedophiles out there, and an even greater number of men who aren’t pedophiles but kinda want to mess around with kids.

There was the whole incest thing. That too is not a big deal, though; father-daughter incest is a very common male fantasy.

Then there was the white supremacist thing. Who cares; in 2018, white supremacist beliefs are pretty common. It’s really just a throwback to an earlier time when such opinions were the majority viewpoint.

Then there was the radical patriarchist, wanting-to-make-women-property thing. That’s a fairly typical incel or manosphere or Alt-Right proposal. Roosh is pretty much on the same page with that.

Then there was the whole rapist thing. It’s fairly common for men to get accused of rape during divorce or child custody proceedings.

Being a white supremacist, patriarchist, pro-incest, pro-pedo politician is pretty normal for our era, when you think about it. Radical libertarians have probably been quietly pro-incest and pro-pedo for awhile now, and the more based libertarians have had white supremacist and patriarchist leanings as well. So I don’t see what the big deal is.